Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re William B. Jolley
Paid petition
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
I Do Merit Systems Protection Board (MSPB) decisions of Veteran and Whistleblower appeals fail for lack of “due process” where 5 C.F.R. f 1201.57(d), states “the Board will not consider matters described at 5 U.S.C. f 7701(c)(2) in an appeal covered by this section.”? II Did the ultra vires act of two individual MSPB Board members creating the so called “Ratification Order” stating, “we today approve these appointments as our own under Article II of the Constitution,” satisfy the Supreme Court requirements for administrative judges as set forth by the Supreme Court in Lucia v. SEC, et. seq. (App.7) III Should 38 U.S.C. ^ 4324 (App.3) be declared unconstitutional because it creates unequal protection of laws for Veterans from that which is provided by 38 U.S.C. f 4323. (App.4)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
William B. Jolley
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Linked docket
23M49
Proceedings
- Apr 15 2024Petition DENIED.
- Mar 20 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
- Mar 14 2024Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Feb 20 2024Motion (23M89) for leave to proceed as a veteran Granted.
- Jan 10 2024MOTION (23M89) DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/16/2024.
- Jan 05 2024Motion (23M89) for leave to proceed as a veteran filed.
- Jan 05 2024Petition for a writ of mandamus and/or prohibition filed. (Response due March 21, 2024)