Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Josh Patrick v. LaRhonda Dunlap Perez
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 23-5193 · judgment October 11, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
QUESTIONS OF LAW PRESENTED
-
Is there variance among federal judicial circuits regarding how they apply Fourth Amendment law in excessive force cases involving taser use?
-
Should the Sixth Circuit's collapsed Graham test be adopted for implementation nationwide in all federal judicial circuits to harmonize these inconsistent circuit opinions and to create greater uniformity and consistency in Fourth Amendment use of force taser cases?
-
What effect are a subject's deliberate, clear, and unequivocal sworn admissions to be given in assessing whether a subject was engaged in active resistance?
-
Is a police officer entitled to qualified immunity if he/she tases a subject that is actively resisting or attempting to evade by flight?
-
Did this Sixth Circuit panel wrongly deny Patrick qualified immunity under the clearly established law and given that there is no clear evidence of a constitutional violation? (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jason B. Bell
Bell, Hess & Van Zant, PLC
For respondent
Aaron Bentley
Aaron Bentley, Attorney
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Apr 01 2024Petition DENIED.
- Mar 12 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/28/2024.
- Feb 29 2024Waiver of right of respondent LaRhonda Dunlap Perez to respond filed.
- Feb 12 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 15, 2024)