Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Andrew S. Clyde, Individually and in His Official Capacity as a Member of the U.S. House of Representatives, et al. v. William McFarland, in His Official Capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 22-5263 · judgment October 20, 2023


Certiorari denied · April 15, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 13% cert probability (95% interval 9%–20%)

Before the decision, about 3.2× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).

Questions presented

The Constitution’s Speech or Debate Clause provides in pertinent part that, “for any Speech or Debate in either House, [Senators and Representatives] shall not be questioned in any other Place.” Art. I, § 6, cl.1. The Behavior Clause of the Constitution provides that, “[e]ach House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.” Art. I, § 5, cl.2. And the Constitution’s Twenty-Seventh Amendment states that, “No law, varying the compensation for the services of the Senators and Representatives, shall take effect, until an election of Representatives shall have intervened.” Amend. XXVII.

  1. Whether the Speech or Debate Clause creates a jurisdictional bar to judicial consideration of whether internal congressional rules or practices violate other textual provisions of the Constitution?

  2. W hether the immunity from suit created by the Speech or Debate Clause extends to administrative functions within Congress like payroll deductions and floor security that are not core legislative activities?

  3. Whether the T wenty-Seventh A mendment to the Constitution prohibits the U.S. House of Representatives from reducing Members’ compensation by deducting punitive fines from their salaries before the Members receive those salaries?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Earl Neville Mayfield III
Juris Day, PLLC

For respondent
Matthew B. Berry
Office of General Counsel

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 15 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 27 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/12/2024.
  3. Mar 13 2024
    Brief of respondents William McFarland, in His Official Capacity as Sergeant at Arms of the U.S. House of Representatives, et al. in opposition filed.
  4. Jan 30 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including March 13, 2024.
  5. Jan 29 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from February 12, 2024 to March 13, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  6. Jan 10 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 12, 2024)