Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Madeleine Pickens v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-55197 · judgment May 17, 2023
Before the decision, about 4.8× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
When an individual passes away, the executor of his estate must pay estate taxes. If the executor fails to pay, the Internal Revenue Service may enforce a tax lien that attaches to all estate property, and may impose personal liability on executors. This case involves an additional, extraordinary authority available to the IRS under 26 U.S.C. § 6324(a)(2). That statute provides that if estate taxes are not paid when due, an individual who falls within six statutory categories who receives, or has on the date of the decedent’s death, property included in the gross esdent's tate under sections 2034 to 2042, inclusive, to the extent of the value, at the time of the decedent’s death, of such property, shall be persondent's ally liable for such tax. Id. For nearly 100 years, all three Branches of Government agreed that this provision empowers the IRS to impose personal liability on third parties who have or receive estate property immediately "on“on the date of the decedent’s death,” and who can thus "delay decedent's death," “delay or defeat collection” collection" of estate taxes. Higley v. Comm’r, Comm'r, 69 F.2d 160, 163 (8th Cir. 1934). All three Branches also agreed that Section 6324(a)(2) does not apply to beneficiaries of a trust who receive estate assets after a decedent’s death, and who are not responsible for the discedent's estate’s assets. In the decision below, tribution of the estate's the Ninth Circuit broke with this longstanding consensus and held that Section 6324(a)(2) applies to persons who receive estate property at the date of death or anytime thereafter. (i)
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Neal Kumar Katyal
Hogan Lovells US LLP
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Mar 04 2024Petition DENIED.
- Feb 14 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/1/2024.
- Feb 13 2024Reply of petitioner Madeleine Pickens filed. (Distributed)
- Jan 29 2024Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed. VIDED.
- Dec 21 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including January 29, 2024.
- Dec 20 2023Motion to extend the time to file a response from December 28, 2023 to January 29, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- Dec 19 2023Brief amicus curiae of National Taxpayers Union Foundation filed.
- Nov 22 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 28, 2023)
- Oct 10 2023Application (23A311) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until November 22, 2023.
- Oct 05 2023Application (23A311) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 23, 2023 to November 22, 2023, submitted to Justice Kagan.