Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Liam C. Lattin v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, No. 22-0211 · judgment March 31, 2023
Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces below, and a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition).
Question presented
In Herring v. United States, 555 U.S. 135 (2009), this Court established the framework for determining when evidence must be suppressed under the Exclusionary Rule. That framework balances the deterrent value of suppression against its social cost. This case presents the question whether the social cost of suppression is determined on a case-by-case basis or has been resolved categorically by this Court’s Fourth Amendment jurisprudence.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Brenner McGrath Fissell
Law Office of Brenner Fissell
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Oct 02 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jul 19 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
- Jul 17 2023Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
- Jul 14 2023Letter from petitioner received.
- Jul 10 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 11, 2023)
- Jun 21 2023Application (22A1094) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until August 28, 2023.
- Jun 15 2023Application (22A1094) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from June 29, 2023 to August 28, 2023, submitted to The Chief Justice.