Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jacob Hilbert v. Missouri
Paid petition · Supreme Court of Missouri, No. SC99747 · judgment March 21, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Petitioner appeared for trial along with counsel. The trial court stated that defense counsel had represented that defense counsel wanted a bench trial, which defense counsel confirmed. The matter proceeded to bench trial. Midway through the bench trial, the prosecutor asked the trial court if a written waiver of the right to a jury trial had been filed. Defense counsel indicated he would file a written waiver. No written waiver was filed. Petitioner was convicted. On appeal, the Missouri Supreme Court held that a constitutionally valid waiver of the right to jury trial did not require any affirmative action of the defendant, as long as the record established a knowing, intelligent, and valid waiver. The question presented is: must a trial court obtain some personal acknowledgement from a criminal defendant that the defendant has waived the defendant’s right to a jury trial for a purported waiver to be constitutionally sufficient?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
N. Scott Rosenblum
Rosenblum, Schwartz, Fry & Johnson
For respondent
Daniel N. McPherson
Assistant Attorney General
Proceedings
- Nov 20 2023Petition DENIED.
- Nov 01 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/17/2023.
- Oct 30 2023Waiver of right of respondent State of Missouri to respond filed.
- Sep 28 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 3, 2023)
- Jul 25 2023Application (23A65) granted by Justice Kavanaugh extending the time to file until September 29, 2023.
- Jul 20 2023Application (23A65) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from July 31, 2023 to September 29, 2023, submitted to Justice Kavanaugh.