Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

William Edward Powell v. Janet L. Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 22-5200 · judgment December 28, 2023


Certiorari denied · December 16, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 15% cert probability (95% interval 9%–22%)

Before the decision, about 3.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, counsel with five or more prior petitions here, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Question presented

Section 6103 of the Internal Revenue Code, 26 U.S.C. § 6103, establishes a liberal and detailed regime for taxpayers to obtain from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) their own tax returns and return information (including the returns and return information of estates they administer and corporations to which they are closely tied). At the same time, the provision severely limits anyone from obtaining another’s returns and return information. Previously, this Court upheld enforcement of § 6103’s limits on disclosure of others’ return information in a claim brought under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552. See Church of Scientology v. IRS, 484 U.S. 9, 18 (1987). But the Court has not addressed the proper judicial review scheme for taxpayers seeking to compel disclosure of their own returns and return information. The Sixth and Seventh Circuits have held that § 6103 is a specific statute displacing FOIA, making a suit to enforce § 6103 under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), 5 U.S.C. § 706, the remedy to challenge an IRS disclosure refusal. The Third, Fifth, Tenth, Eleventh, and D.C. Circuits have held that FOIA – with its more limited requirement for searches for records, its exemptions to disclosure, and its unique enforcement scheme – exclusively controls. The First Circuit has sanctioned a hybrid approach. The Question Presented is: Is § 6103 a specific statute displacing FOIA, so that the remedy for taxpayers to compel disclosure of their returns and return information is a suit under the APA to enforce § 6103?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Anthony F. Shelley
Miller & Chevalier

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Linked docket
23A1032

Proceedings

  1. Dec 16 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Nov 26 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/13/2024.
  3. Nov 21 2024
    Reply of petitioner William E. Powell filed.
  4. Nov 08 2024
    Brief of respondent United States in opposition filed.
  5. Oct 11 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including November 8, 2024.
  6. Oct 09 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 15, 2024 to November 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  7. Sep 06 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including October 15, 2024. See Rule 30.1.
  8. Sep 05 2024
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from September 13, 2024 to October 14, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
  9. Aug 14 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
  10. Aug 14 2024
    Response Requested. (Due September 13, 2024)
  11. Jul 31 2024
    Waiver of right of respondent Janet L. Yellen, in Her Official Capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Treasury, et al. to respond filed.
  12. Jun 27 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 31, 2024)
  13. May 23 2024
    Application (23A1032) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until June 28, 2024.
  14. May 16 2024
    Application (23A1032) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from May 29, 2024 to June 28, 2024, submitted to The Chief Justice.