Noel West Lane, III v. Matthew Curtis Witt, et al.

In Summary, should the Supreme Court issue guidance to state courts on unaddressed, mandatory accommodation to judicial discretion to provide fair hearing to all litigants and clarify its decisions in Bronson v. Schulten,104 U. S. 410, (1881) versus Hazel-Atlas Glass Co. v Hartford-Empire Co., 322 U.S. 238 (1944) so that the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment is not violated when judicial discretion is used in error and a state court does not void a pro se litigant’s or any litigant’s procedural errors when the litigant has clearly presented the facts in evidence of manifest fraud on the court? Specifically, I. Did the Bankruptcy Court; The Bankruptcy Appellate Panel; and the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals error in not using their judicial discretion to void two procedural errors made by Petitioner? II. Were the Bankruptcy Court; The Bankruptcy