Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ade Olumide v. Minnesota, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Minnesota, No. A23-1230 · judgment September 19, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Article TV s4, Article VI s2, 1st, 4th, 5th, 14th Amendments refer to the U.S. Constitution. Question 1: Do incite harm tests for the US Supreme Court show that Article IV s4, 1st, 4th, 5th, 14th Amendment “due process” include press freedom to search identified or de-identified police complaint tribunals records and report on decisions that incite police misconduct through a lack of mandatory decertification of “sufficiently imminent and substantial” “risk of harm” to “life, liberty, or property"? Question 2: Is open court civil derived from 1st Amendment press freedom, Article IV s4 open government, 5th 14th Amendment due process? Does open court apply to police complaint adjudication? Question 3: Do 1st Amendment press freedom rights to report on public interest matters, include open court access to police complaint adjudication records? Question 4: Are de-identified police complaints transparency, an irreducible constitutional minimum? Question 5: Are Minnesota Statutes slSD.Ol §Subd. 2. Exceptions (2) “when it is exercising quasi-judicial
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ade Olumide
For respondent
Rachel Elizabeth Bell-Munger
Minnesota Attorney General's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Jul 24 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jul 02 2024Waiver of right of respondent Respondent City of Minneapolis to respond filed.
- Jun 28 2024Waiver of right of respondent State of Minnesota by Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights to respond filed.
- Feb 26 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 12, 2024)