Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Tsai-Fen Lee v. Washington
Paid petition · Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1, No. 84274-9-I · judgment July 31, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether Trial Court erred in accepting defendant Tsai-Fen Lee to plead guilty when the plea was on its face equivocal.
-
Can Lee’s guilty plea be considered voluntary when she was deprived of liberty by her own counsel for almost 4 months?
-
Whether it is an effective assistance of counsel when trial counsel fails to perform basic research regarding the law.
-
Whether the petitioner’s constitutional rights to effective assistance of counsel and due process were violated when her appellate counsel failed to utilize investigation results and failed to raise substantial claims of coercion and ineffective assistance of trial counsel in the opening brief.
-
Whether the denial of the petitioner’s pro se motion for reconsideration by the lower court, after ruling on the merits, warrants Supreme Court review to address the deficiencies in the appellate process.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Corey Evan Parker
The Appellate Law Firm
For respondent
Amy R. Meckling
King County Prosecuting Attorney's Office
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Jun 18 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jun 11 2024Waiver of right of respondent Washington to respond filed.
- Jun 03 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 8, 2024)