Paula Bourne, et vir v. Banner University Medical Center Phoenix, LLC

Did the Arizona Court of Appeals errantly affirm and allow Arizona Superior Court to designate Bourne’s vexatious litigants and dismiss their case under A.R.S. § 12-3201 and through their claimed inherent authority under Madison v. Groseth, 230 Ariz. 8, 14, H 17 (App. 2012)?

Do the actual adjudicated facts, written in the October 9, 2020, Court Order, one-year-and-eight-months-intocase (February 2019 - October 2020), completely contradict the State’s vexatious litigant label and the dismissal of Bourne’s complaint as a sanction?

Asa matter of law, a cell phone recorded adjudicated, October 9, 2020, Court Order, victim with adjudicated. October 9, 2020, Court Order, medical record diagnosed, respondent (defendant) caused injuries, now needs the Supreme Court of the United States, as a matter of national importance for victim’s rights, across our entire country, to decide: Is this action designating adjudicated victim’s vexatious litigants and dismissing their cases to be stopped, reversing this injustice, or in opposition, to approve Arizona and United States courts declaring proven victim’s (as in petitioner’s case) vexatious litigants and dismissing their cases?

Following the October 9, 2020, Court Order’s adjudicated factual medical record admissions and the