Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Patrick Shin v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-16833 · judgment March 15, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether a district court may require an additional showing of prejudice to grant a writ of coram nobis in a criminal case, and, if so, whether the required showing of prejudice is consistent with the standard set forth in Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (1984), wherein the district court must analyze the defendant’s decision making process, identify the determinative issue for the defendant, and analyze and resolve whether contemporary evidence supported the defendant’s post hoc assertion that, if properly advised, the defendant would have gone to trial rather than plead guilty.
-
Whether Bryan v. United States, 524 U.S. 184 (1998) overruled United States v. Carrier, 654 F.2d 559, 561 (9th Cir. 1981), by requiring a showing that the defendant had knowledge that the false statement was unlawful to prove a willful state of mind when prosecuting an illegal false statement under 18 U.S.C. §1001.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
David Justin Minkin
McCorriston Miller Mukai MacKinnon LLP
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 02 2023Petition DENIED.
- Aug 23 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
- Aug 15 2023Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Jul 20 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 7, 2023)