Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gregory Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 22-15869 · judgment October 30, 2023
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a Ninth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Question presented
Did the Ninth Circuit err in affirming dismissal of, and declaring frivolous, constitutional due process claims pursuant to an express private right of action under federal law when five other circuits, district courts and commentators recognize a property interest in such claims flowing from the Fifth Amendment and this Court has held the same with respect to due process interests under the Fourteenth Amendment?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Jeffrey T. Green
Green Law Chartered LLC
For respondent
Sean Hoe Donahue
Donahue, Goldberg & Herzog
Proceedings
- Oct 07 2024Petition DENIED.
- Jul 10 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/30/2024.
- Jun 24 2024Waiver of right of respondent Tahoe Regional Planning Agency to respond filed.
- Jun 04 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including July 8, 2024, for all respondents.
- Jun 03 2024Motion to extend the time to file a response from June 7, 2024 to July 8, 2024, submitted to The Clerk.
- May 06 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 7, 2024)
- Mar 02 2024Application (23A793) granted by Justice Kagan extending the time to file until May 5, 2024.
- Feb 23 2024Application (23A793) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from March 6, 2024 to May 5, 2024, submitted to Justice Kagan.