Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Mark Wilson v. Schlumberger Technology Corporation

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 21-1231 · judgment September 11, 2023


Certiorari denied · June 10, 2024
Pre-decision estimate: 2% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

The Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. 201, et seq. (“FLSA”) requires the payment of overtime wages to the vast majority of American workers, unless those workers fall under an applicable exemption. The exemption alleged to apply to Petitioner Wilson requires that he be paid on a “salary basis.” Pursuant to the legislative rulemaking authority delegated to it by Congress, the Department of Labor set forth the very limited circumstances when an employer can pay additional compensation to salaried employees without violating the “salary basis” test. 29 C.F.R. §541.602(a)-(b). Mr. Wilson was paid on a salary plus day rate basis, but the amount of his “salary” is just 28.5% ($28,812.90) of his compensation while the daily pay is 71.5% ($72,150) of his total compensation ($100,962.90) (a ratio of 1 to 3.5). The questions presented are: 1. Whether an employer who pays an employee a guaranteed weekly amount that exceeds the salary level test and who is also paid additional compensation on an hourly, daily or per shift basis must meet the “reasonable relationship” test of 29 C.F.R. § 541.604(b) to be paid on a salary basis for purposes of the executive, administrative, or professional exemptions to the FLSA and its implementing regulations, where that additional compensation’s relationship to the guaranteed weekly pay exceeds a ratio of 3:1?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Richard Jennings Burch
Bruckner Burch PLLC

For respondent
Robert P. Lombardi
The Kullman Firm

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jun 10 2024
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jun 05 2024
    Letter from counsel for petitioner regarding Fifth Circuit May 24, 2024 opinion in Gentry v Hamilton-Ryker filed. (Received June 7, 2024)
  3. May 21 2024
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/6/2024.
  4. May 02 2024
    Brief of respondent Schlumberger Technology Corporation in opposition filed.
  5. Jan 25 2024
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 3, 2024)