Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. v. Jacob Benson, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 22-16829 · judgment November 20, 2023
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Can Arizona’s anti-arbitration garnishment statute A.R.S. § 12-1584, which itself violates the Federal Arbitration Act, reverse preempt the Liability Risk Retention Act of 1986, 15 U.S.C. § 3901 et seq. as to divest foreign risk retention groups operating in Arizona of their contractually bargained for right to arbitration as a means of resolving insurance coverage disputes?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Michael J. Schroeder
Michael J. Schroeder P.C.
For respondent
David R. Schwartz
Udall Shumway, PLC
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage
Proceedings
- May 28 2024Petition DENIED.
- May 07 2024DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/23/2024.
- May 07 2024Reply of petitioner Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. filed. (Distributed)
- May 01 2024Brief amicus curiae of National Risk Retention Association filed.
- Apr 23 2024Brief of respondents Jacob Benson, et al. in opposition filed.
- Mar 28 2024Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 1, 2024)