Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Nayonn Gray v. Autozoners, LLC, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 22-1069 · judgment November 15, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
42 U.S.C. § 1981 provides that “[a]ll persons . . . have the same right . . . to make and enforce contracts.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a). The statute further states that “the term ‘make and enforce contracts’ includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.” Id. § 1981(b). The question presented is: Whether summary judgment should be granted when there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether a defendant’s refusal to provide services requested under contract was motivated by racially discriminatory intent, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, when the defendant called himself a “white power oppressor,” admitted the statement was a synonym for racist, and expressly intended to mock and trivialize the plaintiff.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Shereef Hadi Akeel
Akeel & Valentine, PLC
For respondent
Michael Thomas Berger
Rosati Schultz Joppich & Amtsbuecher, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 22 2023Petition DENIED.
- May 02 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
- Apr 20 2023Waiver of right of respondent AutoZoners, LLC to respond filed.
- Apr 18 2023Waiver of right of respondent Nicholas Isles to respond filed.
- Mar 17 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2023)