Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Nayonn Gray v. Autozoners, LLC, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 22-1069 · judgment November 15, 2022


Certiorari denied · May 22, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

42 U.S.C. § 1981 provides that “[a]ll persons . . . have the same right . . . to make and enforce contracts.” 42 U.S.C. § 1981(a). The statute further states that “the term ‘make and enforce contracts’ includes the making, performance, modification, and termination of contracts, and the enjoyment of all benefits, privileges, terms, and conditions of the contractual relationship.” Id. § 1981(b). The question presented is: Whether summary judgment should be granted when there are genuine issues of material fact as to whether a defendant’s refusal to provide services requested under contract was motivated by racially discriminatory intent, in violation of 42 U.S.C. § 1981, when the defendant called himself a “white power oppressor,” admitted the statement was a synonym for racist, and expressly intended to mock and trivialize the plaintiff.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Shereef Hadi Akeel
Akeel & Valentine, PLC

For respondent
Michael Thomas Berger
Rosati Schultz Joppich & Amtsbuecher, P.C.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. May 22 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 02 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
  3. Apr 20 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent AutoZoners, LLC to respond filed.
  4. Apr 18 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent Nicholas Isles to respond filed.
  5. Mar 17 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 20, 2023)