Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Monte Silver, Ltd. v. Internal Revenue Service, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 21-5116 · judgment December 6, 2022
Before the decision, about 1.9× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a D.C. Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a business petitioner.
Question presented
This case presents an important question as to the proper application of Article III standing to small businesses who challenge regulations under the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. § 601 et seq. (“RFA”). Petitioner, a small business, challenged regulations that were issued by Respondents in implementing the so-called Transition Tax [26 U.S.C. § 965] under the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”), Pub. L. 115–97 (2017). The lawsuit was dismissed for lack of Article III standing. The question presented is whether a small business has Article III standing to bring an RFA action challenging a regulation, where: it is the object of the regulation; and where its past and prospective compliance costs are traceable to an RFA procedural violation which is the basis for its standing.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
L. Marc Zell
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- May 01 2023Petition DENIED.
- Apr 12 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/28/2023.
- Apr 05 2023Waiver of right of respondent IRS, et al. to respond filed.
- Mar 03 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due April 17, 2023)