Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Joe Alfred Izen, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 21-60679 · judgment June 29, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Questions presented
-
Whether equitable tolling may extend substantiation evidence gathering deadlines under I.R.C. § 170(f )(12).
-
Whether Congress lacks the power to delegate unbridled discretion to the Commissioner to refuse to promulgate regulations which provide equitable relief from filing deadlines in appropriate cases.
-
Whether in a statutory scheme conflicting provisions must be construed and applied, if possible, so that both competing purposes can be realized.
-
Whether Petitioner was entitled to a hardship exemption under I.R.C. § 170(f )(11).
-
Whether the Petitioner Izen was entitled to summary judgment because the Commissioner failed to present controverting evidence supporting his claim that a charitable deduction was never made and that the charitable deduction had no value.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joe Alfred Izen Jr.
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Federal Taxation (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Linked docket
22A520
Order
Order list, April 24, 2023 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Apr 24 2023Petition DENIED.
- Apr 05 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
- Mar 28 2023Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed.
- Feb 23 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 29, 2023)
- Dec 14 2022Application (22A520) granted by Justice Alito extending the time to file until February 27, 2023.
- Dec 09 2022Application (22A520) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from December 29, 2022 to February 27, 2023, submitted to Justice Alito.