Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Ultra Petroleum Corporation, et al. v. Ad Hoc Committee of OpCo Unsecured Creditors, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 21-20008 · judgment October 14, 2022


Certiorari denied · May 22, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 26% cert probability (95% interval 20%–34%)

Before the decision, about 6.3× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a Fifth Circuit decision below, and a circuit split argued in the petition.

Question presented

The Bankruptcy Code disallows claims for “unmatured interest,” i.e., claims for interest not yet mature when the bankruptcy petition was filed. 11 U.S.C. §502(b)(2). In the decision below, the Fifth Circuit unanimously (and correctly) held that this provision by its terms disallows respondents’ claim for a $201 million “make-whole” amount that was explicitly designed to compensate respondents for future unmatured interest. But a two-judge majority then went on to hold that an unwritten, judiciallycreated “solvent-debtor exception” dating back to preCode practice overrode the plain statutory text and allowed respondents to recover from petitioners both that $201 million make-whole amount and an additional $186 million in post-petition interest at steep contractual default rates. The decision below is the second in less than a year to hold, over vigorous dissent and in conflict with numerous other courts, that an unwritten “solvent-debtor exception” supersedes the plain language of the Bankruptcy Code and permits creditors to recover amounts that the Code expressly disallows. Notably, the decision below held that decisions of this Court compelled this atextual approach. The question presented is: Whether an unwritten “solvent-debtor exception” overrides the Bankruptcy Code’s statutory text and allows creditors in solvent-debtor cases to recover amounts that the Code disallows.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Paul D. Clement
Clement & Murphy, PLLC

For respondent
Lawrence Saul Robbins
Friedman Kaplan Seiler Adelman & Robbins LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. May 22 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. May 02 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
  3. Apr 12 2023
    Rescheduled.
  4. Apr 05 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/21/2023.
  5. Apr 05 2023
    Reply of petitioners Ultra Petroleum Corporation, et al. filed. (Distributed)
  6. Mar 20 2023
    Brief of respondents OpCo Noteholders, et al. in opposition filed.
  7. Mar 20 2023
    Brief of respondents Ad Hoc Committee of OpCo Unsecured Creditors in opposition filed.
  8. Feb 13 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 20, 2023) (Corrected appendix uploaded February 21, 2023)