Ganiyu Ayinla Jaiyeola v. Thomas L. Dorwin

Question 1 presented is: Whether the Supreme Court order that Federal Courts of Appeals are obligated to sua sponte review subject-matter jurisdiction is­ sues regardless of the circumstances. Gonza­ lez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134 (2012). “When a party against whom a judgment for affirmative relief is sought has failed to plead or otherwise defend, and that failure is shown by affidavit or otherwise, the clerk must enter the party’s default.” Fed. R. Civ. R 55(a). “The rules at issue here are the Fed­ eral Rules of Civil Procedure, which have the same force of law that any statute does.” In re Nat’l Prescription Opiate Litig., No. 20-3075 (6th Cir. 2020). Plaintiff filed a Motion (TWO times) per Rule 55(a) for Dorwin (the Clerk of the District Court) to enter a default against Defendant Brundage in an Unauthorized Practice of Law lawsuit. (Jaiyeola v. Brund­ age, No. l:21-cv-01053 (W.D. Mich. 2021)). Dorwin did not consider the two Motions and Dorwin did not respond to the two Motions. A Clerk is required to respond to Motions di­ rected to the Clerk. Dorwin violated Plain­ tiffs’ “constitutional right to due process and equal protection,”1 violated Plaintiff’s “first amendment”2 rights, and denied Plaintiff due 1 Futernick. 2 Filipas. , 'rr1' r,: '-?P