Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Jessica Mackey v. American Multi-Cinema, Incorporated

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 21-30687 · judgment June 8, 2022


Certiorari denied · April 3, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

Except in very rare instances such as the complete lack of proof, black letter Louisiana tort law holds that determination of breach of duty is a question of fact to be decided by the factfinder at trial. In Broussard v. State of Louisiana, ex rel. Office of State Buildings, 113 So.3d 175 (La. 2013), the Supreme Court of Louisiana expressly established this rule when applying Louisiana’s four-factor risk-utility balancing test for determining whether an allegedly defective condition presents an unreasonable risk of harm. The question presented here is whether the Fifth Circuit violated the Erie requirement of vertical uniformity by adopting a legal rule on premises liability that directly conflicts with Broussard, failed to conduct Broussard’s risk-utility balancing test, ignored Broussard’s holding disapproving determination of unreasonable risk of harm on summary judgment, and disregarded multiple precedents of this Court applying Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 to deprive Petitioner of the right to trial by jury under the Seventh Amendment. (i)

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Gregory Lawrence Ernst
Ernst Law Firm, PLC

For respondent
Guyton Henri Valdin
Duplass APLC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Apr 03 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Mar 23 2023
    Supplemental brief of petitioner Jessica Mackey filed. (Distributed)
  3. Mar 15 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/31/2023.
  4. Mar 15 2023
    Reply of petitioner Jessica Mackey filed. (Distributed)
  5. Mar 01 2023
    Brief of respondent American Multi-Cinema, Inc. in opposition filed.
  6. Jan 30 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due March 3, 2023)