Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Stacey A. Kincaid, Sheriff, Fairfax County, Virginia v. Kesha T. Williams

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 21-2030 · judgment August 16, 2022


Certiorari denied · June 30, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability

Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a state or local-government petitioner, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and counsel who has filed here before.

Question presented

Congress enacted the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. § 12101 et seq (the “ADA”) in 1990 and amended the act in 2008. Under Title II of the ADA, “no qualified individual with a disability shall, by reason of such disability, be excluded from participation in or be denied the benefits of the services, programs, or activities of a public entity, or be subjected to discrimination by any such entity.” 42 U.S.C. § 12132. The ADA, however, excludes from its definition of “disability” “transvestism, transsexualism, pedophilia, exhibitionism, voyeurism, gender identity disorders not resulting from physical impairments, [and] other sexual behavior disorders,” as well as “compulsive gambling, kleptomania, . . . pyromania; or . . . psychoactive substance use disorders resulting from current illegal use of drugs.” 42 U.S.C. § 12211(b) (emphasis added). Here, a divided panel of the Fourth Circuit held that § 12211(b)(1) did not exclude the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, as described in the American Psychiatric Association’s (the “APA”) publication the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Health Disorders, Fifth Edition (the “DSM-5”), from the definition of disability because it was not “gender identity disorder.” The question presented is: 1. Whether the diagnosis of gender dysphoria, found in the DSM-5, is excluded from the ADA’s definition of disability under 42 U.S.C. § 12211(b).

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Alexander Francuzenko
Cook Craig & Francuzenko, PLLC

For respondent
Katherine Lynn Herrmann
The Erlich Law Office, PLLC

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 9 conferences

Argument & decision

Decided June 30, 2023.

Proceedings

  1. Jun 30 2023
    Petition DENIED. Justice Alito, with whom Justice Thomas joins, dissenting from the denial of certiorari. (Detached Opinion)
  2. Jun 29 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/29/2023.
  3. Jun 20 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/22/2023.
  4. Jun 12 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
  5. Jun 05 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/8/2023.
  6. May 31 2023
    Rescheduled.
  7. May 30 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/1/2023.
  8. May 23 2023
    Rescheduled.
  9. May 22 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/25/2023.
  10. May 16 2023
    Rescheduled.
  11. May 15 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/18/2023.
  12. May 10 2023
    Rescheduled.
  13. Apr 19 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
  14. Apr 03 2023
    Brief of respondent Kesha Williams in opposition filed.
  15. Feb 06 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including April 3, 2023.
  16. Feb 03 2023
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from March 2, 2023 to April 3, 2023, submitted to The Clerk.
  17. Jan 31 2023
    Response Requested. (Due March 2, 2023)
  18. Jan 18 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/17/2023.
  19. Jan 13 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent Kesha Williams to respond filed.
  20. Jan 05 2023
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due February 8, 2023)