Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
In Re Larry E. Klayman
Paid petition
Certiorari denied · March 20, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate: the model weighted this down for a self-represented petitioner.
Question presented
- Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (“DCCA”) err by “temporarily suspending” (“Mr. Klayman”) from the practice of law pending the outcome of In re Klayman, 20-BG-583 (D.C.C.A.) (the “Sataki Matter”) for twenty (20) months and then on September 15, 2022, further formally suspending Mr. Klayman for eighteen (18) months with a reinstatement provision, and therefore failing to grant Mr. Klayman “time served” after a twenty (20) months unconstitutional “temporary suspension” while the proceeding was pending? Thus, the question presented is whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the DCCA to reduce Mr. Klayman’s suspension to “time served” during the temporary suspension period.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Larry Elliot Klayman
Klayman Law Group, P.A.
For respondent
—
Case
Subject area
Attorneys (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Orders
Order list, March 20, 2023 · Mandamus denied
Order list, May 15, 2023 · Rehearing denied
Proceedings
- May 15 2023Rehearing DENIED.
- Apr 25 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
- Apr 14 2023Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Mar 20 2023Petition DENIED.
- Feb 22 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
- Jan 04 2023Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)