Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

In Re Larry E. Klayman

Paid petition

Certiorari denied · March 20, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

  1. Did the District of Columbia Court of Appeals (“DCCA”) err by “temporarily suspending” (“Mr. Klayman”) from the practice of law pending the outcome of In re Klayman, 20-BG-583 (D.C.C.A.) (the “Sataki Matter”) for twenty (20) months and then on September 15, 2022, further formally suspending Mr. Klayman for eighteen (18) months with a reinstatement provision, and therefore failing to grant Mr. Klayman “time served” after a twenty (20) months unconstitutional “temporary suspension” while the proceeding was pending? Thus, the question presented is whether a writ of mandamus should issue directing the DCCA to reduce Mr. Klayman’s suspension to “time served” during the temporary suspension period.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Larry Elliot Klayman
Klayman Law Group, P.A.

For respondent
—

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Proceedings

  1. May 15 2023
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Apr 25 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/11/2023.
  3. Apr 14 2023
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
    Main DocumentCertificate of Word CountProof of Service
  4. Mar 20 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  5. Feb 22 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/17/2023.
  6. Jan 04 2023
    Petition for a writ of mandamus filed. (Response due February 6, 2023)
    PetitionAppendixCertificate of Word CountProof of Service