Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Gary Mattos, et al. v. AFSCME Council 3

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, No. 20-1531 · judgment September 16, 2022


Certiorari denied · January 17, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 5% cert probability (95% interval 3%–8%)

Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.

Question presented

Section 1983 provides that “every person who, under color of any statute, ordinance, regulation, custom, or usage, of any State” deprives a citizen of a constitutional right “shall be liable to the party injured in an action at law, suit in equity, or other proper proceeding for redress.” 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Petitioners are employees of the State of Maryland who were compelled to pay agency fees to AFSCME Council 3, under color of Maryland state law, in violation of their First Amendment rights according to Janus v. AFSCME, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (2018). The question presented is: does defendant’s goodfaith reliance on a state law before it was held unconstitutional shield it from damages liability for taking agency fees from Petitioners in violation of their constitutional rights under 42 U.S.C. § 1983?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Jeffrey Michael Schwab
Liberty Justice Center

For respondent
Jacob Raffel Karabell
Bredhoff & Kaiser, P.L.L.C.

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Jan 17 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Dec 28 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/13/2023.
  3. Dec 20 2022
    Waiver of right of respondent AFSCME Council 3 to respond filed.
  4. Dec 15 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 19, 2023)