In Re Yi Tai Shao

Do the issues presented below constitute exceptional circumstances that there are no other means to get adequate relief that warrants this Court to exercise its discretion to grant a Writ of Mandamus?

Do Congressional policies that a judge has a paramount duty to decide and that there must be a meaningful appellate review for each appeal underlying 28 U.S.C.§455, 15 U.S.C. §29 and 28 U.S.C. §2109 as held by this Court in United States v. Will, 449 U.S. 200 (1980) require this Petition, in lack of quorum, has not yet had an appellate review for already the second round of appeal, be certified to be transferred to an impartial senior judge at the Court of Appeal in Second Circuit with instruction that this senior neutral judge follows the specific procedure designed by the Congress to empanel an impartial panel as stated in United States v. District Court of Southern New York (App.7-10) when Petitioner’s motion to change place of appeal (ECF1922201 &ECF1920120) and motion to transfer all dispositive motions to Second Court of Appeal (ECF1922459) filed in No.21-5210 appeal at the DC Circuit were all uncontested by any and all 67 Appellees?

Is H2 of 28 U.S.C.§2109 inapplicable to this Petition because the appeal has had no review on the merits?

Do the 216 felonies of alterations of records, concealment of filing, and recent false notices to block access to Supreme Court were done by three courts in D.C. since August 2017 (App.207 through 228, App.152-17) including 111 felonies (84 felonies of the Supreme Court, 20 of Judge Rudolph Contreras, 7 felonies of DC Circuit in 19-524) which had already been tacitly admitted to by all