Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dubar v. Department of Community Affairs
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-11173 · judgment January 4, 2022
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Was Petitioner’s Amended Complaint consid ered in All Courts?
-
Even if considered immune by the Eleventh Amendment in an abstract form, did DCA waive this immunity?
-
Could DCA argue with Immunity in U.S. Courts when such Immunity was stripped from it after November 3, 2020 when Federal Courts got engaged?
-
Is the Taking Clause impaired by the eleventh Amendment?
-
Could the State withdraw DOCUMENT Two without prejudice?
-
Could the State not perform under DOCUMENT THREE without prejudice?
-
Could the State refuse to perform after issuing Document Two and Document Three without pre judice?
-
Is not complying with DOCUMENT TWO and Document Three a Taking?
-
Does not issuing a HAP contract constitute a Taking and KNICK’S LAW is applicable?
-
Is a Default Judgment proper when none of the Defendants (Respondents) answered the AMENDED Complaint?
-
Did Judge Cox commit the 1983 crime?
-
Did Aanal Patel commit the 1983 crime?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar
For respondent
Stephen John Petrany
Georgia Department of Law
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jul 27 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jul 22 2022Waiver of right of respondent Department of Community Affairs to respond filed.
- May 14 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)