Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Abdur-Rahim Dib Dubar v. Department of Community Affairs

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 21-11173 · judgment January 4, 2022


Certiorari denied · October 3, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 1% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Was Petitioner’s Amended Complaint consid­ ered in All Courts?

  2. Even if considered immune by the Eleventh Amendment in an abstract form, did DCA waive this immunity?

  3. Could DCA argue with Immunity in U.S. Courts when such Immunity was stripped from it after November 3, 2020 when Federal Courts got engaged?

  4. Is the Taking Clause impaired by the eleventh Amendment?

  5. Could the State withdraw DOCUMENT Two without prejudice?

  6. Could the State not perform under DOCUMENT THREE without prejudice?

  7. Could the State refuse to perform after issuing Document Two and Document Three without pre­ judice?

  8. Is not complying with DOCUMENT TWO and Document Three a Taking?

  9. Does not issuing a HAP contract constitute a Taking and KNICK’S LAW is applicable?

  10. Is a Default Judgment proper when none of the Defendants (Respondents) answered the AMENDED Complaint?

  11. Did Judge Cox commit the 1983 crime?

  12. Did Aanal Patel commit the 1983 crime?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Abdur-Rahim Dib Dudar

For respondent
Stephen John Petrany
Georgia Department of Law

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 03 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Jul 27 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
  3. Jul 22 2022
    Waiver of right of respondent Department of Community Affairs to respond filed.
  4. May 14 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2022)