Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ayyakkannu Manivannan v. Department of Energy
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2020-1804 · judgment October 12, 2021
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition and a Federal Circuit decision below.
Questions presented
-
Whether a court of appeals must provide an opinion explaining its reasoning in an appeal that involves a complex and unsettled area of the law and in which a written opinion would likely provide the appellant with a viable basis for seeking rehearing, rehearing en banc, or certiorari.
-
Whether federal agency employees who disclose gross waste, mismanagement, or violations of laws, rules, or regulations are protected from agency retaliation only when they later can prove the disclosed misconduct in the Merit Systems Protection Board, where they have been denied any discovery and, “[a]s a practical matter, the agency has far greater access to and control over evidence.” Whitmore v. Department of Labor, 680 F.3d 1353, 1375 (Fed. Cir. 2012).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John J. Powell
Montgomery, McCracken
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 11, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 11 2022Petition DENIED.
- Sep 21 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
- Sep 14 2022Waiver of right of respondent U.S. Department of Energy to respond filed.
- Apr 11 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 16, 2022)