Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Sari Alqsous v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 19-3573, 20-3160 · judgment March 3, 2022
Before the decision, about 1.7× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a Sixth Circuit decision below.
Question presented
Whether the Sixth Circuit erred in analyzing ruling that Petitioner was not entitled to be present during the Charge Conference under Fed. R. Crim. P. 43 and the lack of transcripts from the weekend Charge Conference violated his Confrontation Clause and Due Process rights. Whether, under this Court’s holding in McDonnell, Dr. Alqsous is a Public Official who violated the Hobbs Act and had the requisite mens rea to be found guilty of conspiracy charges. Whether the sentence imposed creates an intra-circuit split with respect to how the quantum of harm is calculated for purposes of sentencing.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert L. Sirianni Jr.
Brownstone, P.A.
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 11, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 11 2022Petition DENIED.
- Sep 14 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/7/2022.
- Sep 07 2022Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Aug 10 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 14, 2022)