Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Dejuan Andre Worthen v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, No. 21-2950 · judgment March 2, 2023
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Question presented
The elements clause provides that felonies that have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force are categorically a crime of violence under the elements clause’s enhancement penalty pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 924(c). In United States v. Taylor, 142 S. Ct. 2015 (2022), this Court held that attempted Hobbs Act robbery was not a crime of violence under the elements clause because the offense did not require the defendant, himself, to commit a violent act. The Taylor decision also held that none of the elements of attempted Hobbs Act robbery required the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force. In this case, the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit held that the Petitioner’s aiding-and-abetting Hobbs Act robbery conviction was a crime of violence under the elements clause, even though the Petitioner did not, himself, engage in a violent act and even though none of the elements of an aiding and abetting offense requires the use, attempted use, or threatened use of force. The question presented is: Whether aiding and abetting a Hobbs Act robbery is a crime of violence under the elements clause.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Triston Chase O'Savio
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 02 2023Petition DENIED.
- Jun 14 2023DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/26/2023.
- Jun 09 2023Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
- May 31 2023Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2023)