Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva v. Department of Veteran Affairs, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 21-2139 · judgment July 11, 2022


Certiorari denied · June 20, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 0% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

  1. Did both the U.S. District Courts for the Northern District of California (Judge Alsup) and the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico (Chief District Judge William Johnson) have a right to issue any ruling in cases No. 3:18-cv-03748-WHA and No. l:21-cv-00761-WJ-JFR if Defendant the United States of America (the former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California Mr. Tse, the Civil Process Clerk at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the former Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mr. Sessions) had never been served with a Summons and with my June 25, 2018 Complaint No. 5:18-cv-03748-LHK in accordance with the F.R.C.P. Rule 4(i)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) and in accordance with the F.R.C.P. Rule 4(i)(l)(B)?

  2. Did both the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit have any right to issue any ruling in my Appeal No. 19-16395 after case No. 3:18-cv-03748-WHA and in my Appeal No. 21- 2139 after case No. l:21-cv-00761-WJ-JFR if Defendant the United States of America (the former U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of California Mr. Tse, the Civil Process Clerk at the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and the former Attorney General of the U.S.A. Mr. Sessions) had never been served with a Summons and with my June 25, 2018 Complaint No. 5:18-cv-03748-LHK in accordance with the F.R.C.P. Rule 4(i)(l)(A)(i) and (ii) and in accordance with the F.R.C.P. Rule 4(i)(l)(B)?

  3. Did the U.S. District Court for the District of New Mexico have any right to dismiss my lawsuit No. l:21-cv-00761-WJ-JFR as a sanction for my non­ existing misconduct without giving me an opportunity to be heard if Assistant U.S. Attorney Ms. Kimberly Robinson criminally and maliciously appeared in this lawsuit as an Opposing Counsel using the name of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ms., Christine Lyman, and Ms. Robinson maliciously blocked the Meet and Confer session before filing a Joint Status Report and a Provisional Discovery Plan?

  4. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit have a right to deny my request for an Oral Argument when had I explicitly notified the 10th Circuit that Assistant U.S. Attorney Ms. Kimberly Robinson criminally and maliciously appeared in this lawsuit as an Opposing Counsel using the name of Assistant U.S. Attorney Ms., Christine Lyman?

  5. Did the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 10th Circuit have a right to criminally, maliciously, and recklessly disregard a material fact of the case in its July 11, 2022 Opinion in Appeal No. 21-2139 that was my April 10, 2017 contact with my former Manager Ms, Dunkelberger when I notified her that, as of May 10, 2017 I had a medical emergency that was running out of my hormonal pills Jeanine that were prescribed by my Russian OB/GYN, that were in aid of the IVF procedure, that I brought from Russia in 2016, that I was taking non­

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Tatyana Evgenievna Drevaleva

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Aug 21 2023
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Jul 27 2023
    DISTRIBUTED.
  3. Jul 15 2023
    Petition for Rehearing filed.
  4. Jun 20 2023
    Petition DENIED.
  5. May 30 2023
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 6/15/2023.
  6. May 24 2023
    Waiver of right of respondent McDonough, Sec'y of VA, et al. to respond filed.
  7. Oct 10 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due June 7, 2023)