Jean Coulter v. Paul Laurence Dunbar Community Center, et al.

This case concerns a District Judge with an extensive history of Bias and violations of the Extrajudicial Source Doctrine - who is confident that Pervasive Bias will again protect him from the repercussions of his decisions to abuse his authority. From the very start, District Judge Schwab sua sponte reviewed other cases and used that knowledge to "support" an order blatantly/adversely affecting Petitioner's ability to respond - ultimately dismissing the Civil Action to avoid ruling on the pending Recusal Motion which cited the specifics of his clear bias in severely restricting Coulter's time for responses. The decision to research and dismiss before ruling on a "then-mooted" Recusal Motion resulted in only a private/quiet reprimand saying doing so was "not ideal". A subsequent Recusal Request cited the District Court's record of abuse - and the jurist responded by fisting the contents of all of Coulter's case he could find. Still this jurist refuses to recuse, despite twice violating ExtraJudicial Source Doctrine - and defying the Circuit (always without penalty). Now, on its 3rd appeal, Defendants' litigation insurance is gone, so the Circuit En Banc upheld the Summary Judgment, rather than again removing this judge from yet another case1! (a.) _________ Questions Presented ______.

1. Has Bias/Pervasive Bias violated Due Process in both the District Court and the Third Circuit?

2. Must procedures be instituted to assure that Appellate Courts act to end any violations of the Extrajudicial Source Doctrine - as acting otherwise means that legitimate decisions cannot be expected? 1 Judge Schwab was removed from U.S. v. Wecht (08-579 Cert, denied), West Penn Allegheny Health System v UPMC and twenty-one (21) Federal Public Defender case. i.