Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lt. Colonel Patrick Schreiber v. Tracy Renaud, Acting Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit, No. 18-3215 · judgment November 24, 2020
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel who has won certiorari before, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Tenth Circuit decision below.
Question presented
The definition of “child” in Section 1101(b)(1) of the Immigration and Nationality Act includes “a child legitimated under the law of the child’s [or father’s] residence or domicile.” Under this provision, is the law of the relevant residence or domicile dispositive of whether a child is “legitimated,” or does the subsection mandate application of a federal common-law definition of “legitimated” before turning to state law? In the alternative, should the Tenth Circuit’s decision below, which imposed a judicially created administrative issue-exhaustion requirement on a constitutional claim, be vacated and remanded for reconsideration in light of the Court’s recent decision in Carr v. Davis?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Paul Whitfield Hughes
McDermott Will & Emery
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Aug 25 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Aug 23 2021Waiver of right of respondent Renaud, Tracy, et al. to respond filed.
- Jul 21 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 23, 2021)