Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hugh McKinney v. Christine Wormuth, Secretary of the Army
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, No. 20-5189 · judgment July 20, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The Administrative Procedure Act subjects all reviewable agency actions—regardless of which agency acts—to the same standards of judicial review. Neither the legislative history nor the text of the Act itself favors any reviewable agency action, or any agency, with special judicial treatment in the form of super-heightened deference as compared to run-of-the-mill deference. The question presented is: Whether a civilian board’s administrative decisions concerning the correction of military records pursuant to 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a)(1) are properly reviewable subject to an “unusually deferential application” of the arbitrary and capricious standard under the Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706(2)(A).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Seth Alain Watkins
WATKINS LAW & ADVOCACY, PLLC
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jan 26 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
- Jan 19 2022Waiver of right of respondent Christine Wormuth, Secretary of the Army to respond filed.
- Dec 17 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due January 20, 2022)
- Oct 13 2021Application (21A73) granted by The Chief Justice extending the time to file until December 17, 2021.
- Oct 08 2021Application (21A73) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from October 18, 2021 to December 17, 2021, submitted to The Chief Justice.