Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Jasper Knabb v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 19-16097 · judgment August 19, 2021
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a dissent in the court below, and a petition filed soon after the judgment below.
Question presented
Where 28 U.S.C. § 2255 requires a prompt hearing unless the motion and the files and records of the case conclusively show that the prisoner is entitled to no relief, was it error to deny any hearing on the following issue: Whether, as petitioner asserted in an uncontested declaration, he would have rejected a plea deal and gone to trial if he had known that the judge would sentence him to 21 years and 1 month but where, before he accepted the plea deal and pleaded guilty, defense counsel predicted that if he pleaded guilty petitioner “would likely do only months of time,” and where the plea agreement stated an agreed-upon guideline range of 63 to 78 months (level 26).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
John J. E. Markham II
Markham Read Zerner LLC
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, January 10, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Jan 10 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
- Dec 01 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
- Nov 17 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 20, 2021)