Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ojin Kim v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 18-51024 · judgment February 19, 2021
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Fifth Circuit decision below and a circuit split argued in the petition.
Questions presented
-
In cases where the methodology to calculate the guidelines range for sentencing mirrors the methodology to calculate the restitution amount, if a challenge to the restitution order is not barred from appellate review due to factually insufficient evidence, whether the sentence should also be reviewable on appeal.
-
When a Circuit court holds that the restitution order should be vacated due to flawed methodology in determining the amount of infringing items, whether a sentence based on the same arbitrary calculation must also be vacated because deprivation of liberty should receive higher scrutiny rather than criminal monetary sanctions.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Susan Jeanne Clouthier
Clouthier Law, PLLC
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, October 4, 2021 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Aug 04 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jul 29 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States of America to respond filed.
- Jul 19 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 20, 2021)