Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
RLR Investments, LLC v. City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, No. 20-6375 · judgment July 13, 2021
Before the decision, about 1.6× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition), and a Sixth Circuit decision below, and down for a state or local-government respondent.
Question presented
After Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp., 544 U.S. 280 (2005), is it improper for a United States District Court to dismiss claims brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Fifth Amendment of the US Constitution for the unlawful taking of property due to an interlocutory state court order on the basis of the Rooker-Feldman doctrine, which this Court held in Exxon is applicable only to final state-court judgments?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Anthony C. White
Thompson Hine LLP
For respondent
Nathan D. Rowell
Ogle, Rowell & Penland, P.C.
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Jan 18 2022Petition DENIED.
- Dec 29 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
- Dec 15 2021Brief of respondent City of Pigeon Forge, Tennessee in opposition filed.
- Nov 10 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 15, 2021)