Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Shahen Minassian v. Seda Galstian Aghaian, et al.
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B296287 · judgment May 24, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Every President of the United States since President Carter has recognized that Iran presents a unique and compelling threat to world peace and the safety of Americans at home and abroad. In a series of executive orders pursuant to the International Emergency Economic Powers Act, the Executive has promulgated regulations now known as the Iranian Transactions and Sanctions Regulations (ITSR) that prohibit all trade with Iran and its government, subject to limited licenses. In this case, the parties entered into an illegal contract to redeem and sell vast tracts of real property in Iran—providing renumeration to the Government of Iran in the process. Recognizing that the contract was illegal and unenforceable under the ITSR, the California court nonetheless fashioned an equitable remedy under state authority permitting equitable enforcement of an illegal contract. The question presented is: Whether a state court may fashion an equitable remedy for enforcement of an illegal contract for services concerning blocked property prohibited by international trade sanctions regulations promulgated by the Executive to deter terrorism under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Joshua Reuben Furman
Joshua R. Furman Law
For respondent
Steven S. Fleischman
Horvitz & Levy LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 13 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
- Nov 17 2021Waiver of right of respondent Seda G. Aghaian, et al. to respond filed.
- Nov 09 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due December 13, 2021)