Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Ebenezer K. Howe, IV v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-35682
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Question 1: A. Do courts of appeal exhibit a pattern and practice of refusing to adjudicate EVERY ISSUE presented by the Class of disrespected, unrepresented litigants filing appeals arising from the underlying institutionalized IRS record falsification program, and from the open support thereof by U.S. district judges, and B. does the pattern/practice violate the independence and impartiality of the judiciary, and the due process rights of appellants to meaningful access to courts? Question 2: Do U.S. district judges have power to deny explicit, sworn §455 recusal motions directed to magistrates committing acts of apparent misconduct in support of a party? 1 1 In this case, the apparent misconduct of Magistrate Candy W. Dale is literally case-dispositive, as shown below, Question 2, Pg.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ebenezer K. Howe IV
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- May 31 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- May 10 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 5/26/2022.
- Dec 15 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Dec 06 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 09 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/3/2021.
- Nov 03 2021Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Sep 23 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari before judgment filed. (Response due December 1, 2021)