Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Lawrence Marano v. The Metropolitan Museum of Art
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 20-3104 · judgment April 2, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether The Metropolitan Museum of Art’s commercial use of a photograph on its Website to sell tickets to its museum exhibition, as well as in the “brick-andmortar” exhibition itself, was sufficiently transformative to warrant a finding in favor of fair use on the first statutory factor, 17 U.S.C §107(1).
-
Whether Petitioner stated a plausible claim that The Met’s use of his photograph was for commercial purposes.
-
Whether The Met’s use of the photograph across multiple media platforms without any attribution or credit to the Petitionerphotographer constituted bad faith so as to weigh against a finding fair use.
-
Whether The Met’s use of the photograph usurped the actual or potential licensing market.
-
Whether the Court of Appeals properly analyzed the remaining statutory factors in light of its finding of transformative use.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
James Harris Freeman
Liebowitz Law Firm, PLLC
For respondent
Linda J Steinman
Davis Wright Tremaine, LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Aug 11 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Aug 04 2021Waiver of right of respondent The Metropolitan Museum of Art to respond filed.
- Jul 01 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 5, 2021)