Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Whitewater Draw Natural Resource Conservation District, et al. v. Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Secretary of Homeland Security, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 20-55777 · judgment July 19, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
The National Policy Act (“NEPA”), 42 U.S.C. § 4331 et seq. (2012) mandates that all federal agencies consider environmental impacts before acting. The Council on Environmental Quality (“CEQ”), which is responsible for guiding the implementation of NEPA, has mandated that all agencies promulgate NEPA procedures through Notice and Comment rulemaking to use for their NEPA compliance. Do the final NEPA procedures so promulgated fail the two pronged test in Bennett v. Spear, 520 U.S. 154 (1997) for finality under the Administrative Procedures Act if they do not in themselves apply the rules they thus created to actual programs or projects?
-
Does a plaintiff have standing to challenge procedural violations of immigration related actions if the plaintiff can show: 1) the agency violated its procedural obligations; 2) these procedural obligations were meant to protect plaintiff’s concrete interests, and 3) it is reasonably probable that the challenged action will threaten plaintiff’s concrete interests?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Julie B. Axelrod
Center for Immigration Studies
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Dec 13 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
- Nov 18 2021Waiver of right of respondent Mayorkas, Alejandro, et al. to respond filed.
- Oct 18 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 19, 2021)