Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Hemant Bhimnathwala v. New Jersey State Judiciary, et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 20-3526 · judgment June 15, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Does the Fourteenth Amendment require a pre sumption of equal, joint custody of children in child custody proceedings? Is this presumption a logical induction from Obergefell v. Hodges, 576 U.S. 644 (2015), which held that fundamental right to marry may not be denied the under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to same-sex couples?
-
(a) Do disparate-impact claims apply to State Judiciaries, and specifically Family Courts, that receive federal assistance for collecting child support payments as enacted in S.1002 - Child Support Recovery Act of 1992 and implemented in 45 CFR§ 305.31?
-
(b) If such disparate-impact claims are cogniza ble, what are the standards and burdens of proof that should apply?
-
What would the Statute of Limitations if either answer to either 1 or 2 above is affirmative? Would the arguments in National Railroad Pas senger Corporation v. Morgan, 536 U.S. 101
-
apply?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Hemant Bhimnathwala
For respondent
—
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Feb 22 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- Jan 19 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
- Jan 05 2022Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Dec 13 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 23 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/10/2021.
- Oct 06 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)