Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Antoinette Marques v. JPMorgan Chase, N.A.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 19-12548 · judgment February 20, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
QUESTIONS
-
Was Chase, a nonparty and nonagent to a residential note, authorized to declare default and foreclose? Alternatively, does a party that is not a secured creditor to a residential debt, nor an agent thereof, have the right to declare a default and foreclose? If yes, does it need permission from the note owner, and should there be clear guidelines as to what constitutes default and substantial proof this event occurred?
-
Could petitioner's secured debt be transferred independent of the note?
-
What is the definition of "secured creditor?" Alternatively, can Chase, a nonparty to petitioner’s residential note, be called "secured creditor?"
-
Were petitioner's due process rights under the 14th Amendment infringed on by non-judicial foreclosure, resulting in wrongful deprivation of residential property?
-
Was petitioner denied due process under the 5th Amendment by the District Court, resulting in wrongful deprivation of residential property?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Antoinette Marques
For respondent
Gregory R. Crochet
Kutak Rock LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences
Proceedings
- Mar 21 2022Rehearing DENIED.
- Feb 23 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 3/18/2022.
- Dec 15 2021Petition for Rehearing filed.
- Dec 15 2021Motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis.
- Nov 22 2021Petition DENIED.
- Nov 02 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 11/19/2021.
- Oct 26 2021Waiver of right of respondent JP Morgan Chase, N.A. to respond filed.
- Nov 17 2020Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due November 8, 2021)