Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Texas v. Deb Haaland, Secretary of the Interior, et al.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 18-11479 · judgment April 6, 2021


Decided · June 15, 2023
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Questions presented

Consolidated with 21-376. The Indian Child Welfare Act, 25 U.S.C. §§ 1901-63 (ICWA), creates a childcustody regime for "Indian children," a status defined by a child's genetics and ancestry. This regime is designed to make the adoption of Indian children by non-Indians more difficult. To implement this race-based system, Congress required state agencies to provide services "to prevent the breakup of the Indian family" and imposed a placement hierarchy- which may be changed at a child's tribe's direction-favoring Indian-child adoptions by the child's biological relatives, the child's tribe, and then any other Indian. Congress then directed state courts to employ a detailed federal set of procedures in state-law Indian-child-custody proceedings. The questions presented are:

  1. Whether Congress has the power under the Indian Commerce Clause or otherwise to enact laws governing state child-custody proceedings merely because the child is or may be an Indian.

  2. Whether the Indian classifications used in ICWA and its implementing regulations violate the Fifth Amendment's equal-protection guarantee.

  3. Whether ICWA and its implementing regulations violate the anticommandeering doctrine by requiring States to implement Congress's child-custody regime.

  4. Whether ICWA and its implementing regulations violate the nondelegation doctrine by allowing individual tribes to alter the placement preferences enacted by Congress.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Judd Edward Stone II
Texas Attorney General's Office

For respondent
Ian Heath Gershengorn
Jenner & Block

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 5 conferences

Amicus briefs
4 cert-stage

Related
Vide, 21-376, 21-377, 21-380

Argument & decision

Argued November 9, 2022 — Matthew D. McGill · Judd E. Stone · Edwin S. Kneedler · Ian H. Gers.... Audio and transcript

Decided June 15, 2023. Opinion by Barrett.

Proceedings

  1. Jul 17 2023
    Judgment issued.
  2. Jun 15 2023
    Adjudged to be AFFIRMED IN PART, REVERSED IN PART, VACATED AND REMANDED IN PART. Barrett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which Roberts, C. J., and Sotomayor, Kagan, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, and Jackson, JJ., joined. Gorsuch, J., filed a concurring opinion, in which Sotomayor and Jackson, JJ., joined as to Parts I and III. Kavanaugh, J., filed a concurring opinion. Thomas, J., and Alito, J., filed dissenting opinions. VIDED.
  3. Nov 09 2022
    Argued. For Chad Everet Brackeen, et al.: Matthew D. McGill, Washington, D. C. For Texas: Judd E. Stone, II, Solicitor General, Austin, Tex. For federal parties: Edwin S. Kneedler, Deputy Solicitor General, Department of Justice, Washington, D. C. For tribal parties: Ian H. Gershengorn, Washington, D. C. VIDED.
  4. Sep 13 2022
    The record received from the U.S.D.C. Northern District of Texas has been electronically filed.
  5. Sep 12 2022
    Record requested from the U.S.C.A. 5th Circuit.
  6. Sep 12 2022
    The record from the U.S.C.A. 5th circuit is electronic and located on Pacer.
  7. Aug 31 2022
    CIRCULATED
  8. Aug 03 2022
    ARGUMENT SET FOR Wednesday, November 9, 2022. VIDED.
  9. Jul 21 2022
    Blanket Consent filed by Respondent, Navajo Nation
  10. Feb 28 2022
    Petition GRANTED. The petitions for writs of certiorari in Nos. 21-376, 21-377, and 21-380 are granted. The cases are consolidated, and a total of one hour is allotted for oral argument. Parties that were plaintiffs/appellees in the lower courts shall file opening and reply briefs in conformity with Rules 33.1(g)(v) and 33.1(g)(vii), under the schedule set forth in Rules 25.1 and 25.3. Parties that were defendants/appellants in the lower courts shall file briefs in conformity with Rule 33.1(g)(vi), under the schedule set forth in Rule 25.2.
  11. Feb 28 2022
    Because the Court has consolidated these cases for briefing and oral argument, future filings and activity in the cases will now be reflected on the docket of No. 21-376. Subsequent filings in these cases must therefore be submitted through the electronic filing system in No. 21-376. Each document submitted in connection with one or more of these cases must include on its cover the case number and caption for each case in which the filing is intended to be submitted. Where a filing is submitted in fewer than all of the cases, the docket entry will reflect the case number(s) in which the filing is submitted; a document filed in all of the consolidated cases will be noted as “VIDED.”
  12. Feb 22 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/25/2022.
  13. Feb 11 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 2/18/2022.
  14. Jan 18 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/21/2022.
  15. Jan 10 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/14/2022.
  16. Dec 22 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 1/7/2022.
  17. Dec 17 2021
  18. Dec 08 2021
    Brief of respondents Cherokee Nation, et al. in opposition filed.
  19. Dec 08 2021
    Brief of respondents Navajo Nation in opposition filed. VIDED.
  20. Dec 08 2021
    Brief of respondents Chad Everet Brackeen, et al. filed. VIDED.
  21. Dec 08 2021
    Brief of respondents Federal respondents in opposition filed.
  22. Nov 02 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is further extended to and including December 8, 2021, for all respondents.
  23. Nov 01 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from November 8, 2021 to December 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  24. Oct 08 2021
    Brief amici curiae of Christian Alliance for Indian Child Welfare and ICWA Children and Families filed. VIDED.
  25. Oct 08 2021
    Brief amici curiae of Goldwater Institute, et al. filed.VIDED
  26. Oct 05 2021
    Brief amicus curiae of Project on Fair Representation filed.VIDED
  27. Oct 04 2021
    Brief amicus curiae of Ohio filed.VIDED
  28. Sep 27 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response is granted and the time is extended to and including November 8, 2021, for all respondents.
  29. Sep 24 2021
    Motion to extend the time to file a response from October 8, 2021 to November 8, 2021, submitted to The Clerk.
  30. Sep 03 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 8, 2021)