Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Elizabeth C. v. Los Angeles County Department of Children and Family Services
Paid petition · Court of Appeal of California, Second Appellate District, No. B304128 · judgment October 13, 2020
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Questions presented
-
Whether the Fourteenth Amendment due process requirement articulated in Santosky v Kramer, 455 U.S. 745 (1982) that parental rights only be terminated upon clear and convincing evidence of parental unfitness requires that such a finding be made close in time to the termination of parental rights by the state or may be based upon a finding of parental unfitness by clear and convincing evidence made years earlier when the child was initially placed into the custody of the state.
-
Whether any constitutional due process deficiency in a procedure where parental rights are terminated based upon a finding of parental unfitness by clear and convincing evidence made years earlier is cured if the state also finds parental unfitness by a preponderance of the evidence closer in time to the termination of parental rights.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Ronald Durwin Tym
The Tym Firm
For respondent
Tracey Felton Dodds
Office of the County Counsel
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Aug 25 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Jun 18 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due August 9, 2021)