Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Mark Leyse v. Bank of America, National Association

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 20-1666 · judgment May 19, 2021


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 3% cert probability

Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.

Question presented

The text of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”), demonstrates Congress’s determination that certain types of unsolicited telemarketing calls are inherently a nuisance and are harmful within the meaning of Article III of the Constitution. The question is whether Congress, which, as the branch charged with lawmaking, “is well positioned to identify intangible harms that meet minimum Article III requirements,” such that its judgment is “instructive and important,” Spokeo v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016), is to have its judgment respected with regard to the TCPA’s prohibition against the placing of unsolicited prerecorded telephone calls to residential telephone lines.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Daniel Adam Osborn
Osborn Law PC

For respondent
Joseph Russell Palmore
Morrison & Foerster LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 08 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Sep 02 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, National Association to respond filed.
  4. Aug 25 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)