Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Mark Leyse v. Bank of America, National Association
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit, No. 20-1666 · judgment May 19, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
The text of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act, 47 U.S.C. § 227 (“TCPA”), demonstrates Congress’s determination that certain types of unsolicited telemarketing calls are inherently a nuisance and are harmful within the meaning of Article III of the Constitution. The question is whether Congress, which, as the branch charged with lawmaking, “is well positioned to identify intangible harms that meet minimum Article III requirements,” such that its judgment is “instructive and important,” Spokeo v. Robins, 136 S. Ct. 1540, 1549 (2016), is to have its judgment respected with regard to the TCPA’s prohibition against the placing of unsolicited prerecorded telephone calls to residential telephone lines.
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Daniel Adam Osborn
Osborn Law PC
For respondent
Joseph Russell Palmore
Morrison & Foerster LLP
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 04 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 08 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
- Sep 02 2021Waiver of right of respondent Bank of America, National Association to respond filed.
- Aug 25 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due October 1, 2021)