Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
James Clay, et al. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, No. 2019-14441 · judgment March 16, 2021
Before the decision, roughly the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a circuit split argued in the petition, an Eleventh Circuit decision below, and counsel who has filed here before.
Question presented
This Court is presented with a case of first impression regarding the authority of a Federally recognized Indian Tribe, the Miccosukee Tribe of Indians of Florida (“Miccosukee Tribe” or “Tribe”), to determine how to compensate its members for the use of their lands. The Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”), which has exclusive authority over matters arising out of Indian affairs, has never challenged the Miccosukee Tribe’s longstanding compensation method. Rejecting the authority of the Miccosukee Tribe and the BIA, the Courts below adopted the position of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), which recast payments for the use of tribal lands as taxable distributions of net gaming revenue. The question presented is: Whether the clear language of Title 25 of the Code of Federal Regulations, and the exclusive authority over federally recognized Indian Tribes granted to the Secretary of Interior under 25 U.S.C. § 2, controls the determination of how the Miccosukee Tribe compensates its members for the use of their lands, to the exclusion of any other federal agency, including the Internal Revenue Service
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Robert Osley Saunooke
Saunooke Law Firm, PA
For respondent
Brian H. Fletcher
Acting Solicitor General
Case
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Proceedings
- Oct 12 2021Petition DENIED.
- Sep 22 2021DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 10/8/2021.
- Sep 14 2021Waiver of right of respondent Commissioner of Internal Revenue to respond filed.
- Aug 13 2021Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 17, 2021)