Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, No. 2020-1635, 2020-1636


Certiorari denied · October 4, 2021
Pre-decision estimate: 8% cert probability (95% interval 4%–14%)

Before the decision, about 1.9× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a dissent in the court below (flagged in the petition) and a Federal Circuit decision below, and down for a business respondent.

Question presented

The patent statute provides that “[a] person shall be entitled to a patent unless . . . the invention was . . . described in a printed publication . . . in this country, more than one year prior to the date of the application for patent in the United States.” 35 U.S.C. § 102(b) (pre-AIA). This provision has long been interpreted by the courts to require that a document that predates the patent application by over a year is deemed a printed publication only if it is readily available to interested members of the public through generally available medium. The question presented is: Can a document qualify as a printed publication if it is stored on a passwordprotected website, not accessible to the public, and available only to customers who pay over $25,000 dollars to purchase related software?

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Paul Joseph Andre
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP

For respondent
D. Joseph English
Duane Morris LLP

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference

Proceedings

  1. Oct 04 2021
    Petition DENIED.
  2. Sep 01 2021
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/27/2021.
  3. Aug 31 2021
    Waiver of right of respondent Cisco Systems, Inc. to respond filed.
  4. Aug 09 2021
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due September 10, 2021)