Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Arvind Gupta v. Headstrong, Inc., et al.
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, No. 20-3657 · judgment October 19, 2021
Before the decision, well below the 4.1% base rate, with no standout signals pointing toward a grant.
Question presented
Question 1: Whether employers can have a legally enforceable private settlement and release agreement with the nonimmigrant worker in violation of‘INA’ requirements. Question 2: In the absence of any complaint, claim or counterclaim by employer for breach of contract by nonimmigrant worker, did the district court properly award attorneys’ fees to the employer. Question 3: Did Headstrong, Inc. comply with required wage obligations for the period of violations found by the Administrator (Wage-Hour) and the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ).
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Arvind Gupta
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Proceedings
- Oct 03 2022Petition DENIED.
- Jul 20 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
- Jun 03 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 7, 2022)
- Mar 23 2022Application (21A534) granted by Justice Sotomayor extending the time to file until June 5, 2022.
- Mar 18 2021Application (21A534) to extend the time to file a petition for a writ of certiorari from April 6, 2022 to June 5, 2022, submitted to Justice Sotomayor.