Supreme Court Report

Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →

Joy Garner, Individually and on Behalf of The Control Group, et al. v. Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States

Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, No. 21-15587 · judgment February 28, 2022


Certiorari denied · October 3, 2022
Pre-decision estimate: 10% cert probability (95% interval 7%–14%)

Before the decision, about 2.4× the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for a Ninth Circuit decision below, a circuit split argued in the petition, and a business petitioner.

Question presented

Without a control group to establish a cause-andeffect relationship, ‘science’ is not science; it is guesswork. True science requires control groups. Since the start of the National Vaccine Program (enforced by POTUS since 1962), chronic disorders have ballooned in vaccinated people only, while remaining relatively stable in the never-vaccinated population. Logically, the government should study a control group of never-vaccinated people (Petitioners) or at least not destroy their group. Instead, POTUS has directed and managed his subordinates to vaccinate every American, including the control group — the estimated 0.26% threatened group of healthy, never-vaccinated people. Regardless of intentions, and regardless of vaccine safety claims, the President is destroying evidence. He is destroying control groups’ Fifth Amendment right to exist. The government admits its mandatory vaccines remain unstudied with a never-vaccinated control group, such as Petitioners’ group (“Control Group”). Petitioners’ Control Group is necessary to prove any causation of harm. Government data confirm more than one-half of vaccinated Americans suffer lifelong debilitating chronic disorders (i.e., heart disease, diabetes, autoimmune disorders). Yet, these disorders affect less than 6% of the never-vaccinated, according to evidence the Control Group introduced in the District Court. Petitioners allege this simple observation proves the President’s mandatory vaccines harm most people. Conversely, for POTUS to continue claiming his vaccines are safe and effective still requires a genuine control group. Either way, the Judiciary is needed to preserve the evidence.

Counsel of record

For petitioner
Gregory James Glaser
Greg Glaser, Attorney at Law

For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General

Case

Conference history
Distributed for 2 conferences

Amicus briefs
1 cert-stage

Proceedings

  1. Dec 05 2022
    Rehearing DENIED.
  2. Nov 09 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 12/2/2022.
  3. Nov 02 2022
    Suggestion for review and disqualification from counsel for petitioners received.
  4. Oct 28 2022
  5. Oct 03 2022
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Health Research GRANTED.
  6. Oct 03 2022
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Foundation for Moral Law GRANTED.
  7. Oct 03 2022
    Petition DENIED.
  8. Jul 13 2022
    DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 9/28/2022.
  9. Jul 05 2022
    Waiver of right of respondent Joseph R. Biden, Jr., President of the United States respond filed.
  10. Jul 05 2022
    Brief amicus curiae of Children's Health Defense filed.
  11. Jul 05 2022
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Foundation for Moral Law.
  12. Jul 05 2022
    Motion for leave to file amicus brief filed by Institute for Health Research.
  13. May 27 2022
    Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due July 5, 2022)