Supreme Court of the United States · Official docket →
Gregory Bogomol v. United States
Paid petition · United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, No. 18-11486 · judgment August 13, 2021
Before the decision, modestly above the 4.1% base rate. The model weighted this up for counsel with five or more prior petitions here, a Fifth Circuit decision below, and a petition citing one or two dissents.
Questions presented
The questions presented are:
-
What is the proper standard for determining when a federal habeas petitioner is entitled to an evidentiary hearing under 28 U.S.C. § 2255?
-
Does an individual receive ineffective assistance of counsel when his defense attorney fails to file a motion to suppress evidence seized from a warrantless search of the individual’s residence, where law enforcement agents conducted a “knock and talk” at the residence with the intent to search for incriminating evidence and gained entry to search the residence by falsely telling the individual that they were investigating whether he and his wife were the victims of identity theft?
Counsel of record
For petitioner
Andrew Brooks Greenlee
Andrew B. Greenlee, P.A.
For respondent
Elizabeth B. Prelogar
Solicitor General
Case
Subject area
Criminal Procedure (estimated from the questions presented, in the Supreme Court Database’s categories)
Conference history
Distributed for 1 conference
Order
Order list, May 2, 2022 · Certiorari denied
Proceedings
- May 02 2022Petition DENIED.
- Apr 13 2022DISTRIBUTED for Conference of 4/29/2022.
- Apr 08 2022Waiver of right of respondent United States to respond filed.
- Mar 29 2022Petition for a writ of certiorari filed. (Response due May 4, 2022)